Intelligence or nothing

if you don't know where you're going, any road can take you there

THE MUSTS

World

the importance of Tanamesa

  Is Human Intelligence Declining?

Major international studies suggest that the average person’s ability to process information, reason, and solve new problems has been steadily declining over the past 10–12 years — raising a red flag.

  • Overall, there’s still limited data, especially when it comes to factors like attention span and focus. However, one of the few organizations that actually tracks these trends has found a sharp rise in the percentage of people struggling with cognitive functions. Take a look at the charts:

One hypothesis behind this recent decline? The steady drop in reading habits (which we mentioned in the last edition) — especially as people consume fewer long and complex texts.

  • In the most recent study conducted in 2024, for the first time, the majority of respondents reported not having read a single full book—of any genre—in the previous three months.

But It’s Not Just About Reading…

Other key metrics that could indicate “intelligence levels” are also on the decline, including basic numerical reasoning and problem-solving skills.

The percentage of adults in high-income OECD countries who cannot apply mathematical reasoning to simple statements or struggle to synthesize multiple pieces of information from a text has risen to 25%.

It’s easy to point the finger at the usual culprits—smartphones, social media, the internet—but let’s pause for a second. Those things already existed in 2015. If they were the cause, wouldn’t this trend have started much earlier?

The real difference may lie in how we use our smartphones and social media today versus a decade ago. Back then, our engagement was arguably more “active” and required more cognitive effort. Now? Not so much. Consider these shifts:

  • The transition from social, interactive content (from people we know) to algorithm-driven, endless scrolling of content from strangers—highly engaging but with minimal active participation.

  • The move away from long-form texts and articles (which require synthesis, inference, and reflection) toward short, captioned posts (a few sentences, little to no critical thinking needed).

  • The explosion of notifications, each one pulling attention away from previous tasks—or at the very least, occupying mental space even if ignored.

Are We Doomed? Not Quite.

This decline in cognitive metrics doesn’t mean we’re on an inevitable path toward becoming a less intelligent species—let’s not be that pessimistic.

However, it does highlight an important shift: Intelligence isn’t just about potential, it’s about execution. And the way we consume content today is undoubtedly shaping how well (or poorly) we use our intelligence.

So, maybe it’s worth taking a step back and asking: Are we using our brains to their full potential—or just letting them coast? That’s the importance of reading this newsletter my friends. Congratulations if you arrive until here, that’s already more than most people would 🫢 

What else in on

  • USA: Trump signs the end of the Department of Education. He signed an executive order to shut down the US Department of Education and transfer educational authority to the states. (Read)

  • Israel: The country is trying to facilitate the voluntary departure of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. The measure is criticized by NGOs as part of a colonization policy. (Read)

  • Australia: A catastrophic once-in-50-year flood hit Australia’s remote western Queensland, receiving a year’s worth of rain in a week, flooding an area the size of Texas. (Read)

  • Russia: Vladimir Putin signs decree calling up 160,000 Russians for military service. The decree says that recruitment applies to all citizens aged between 18 and 30 and covers the period from April to July. (Read)

  • France: Marine Le Pen, one of the country's strongest right-wing figures, has been convicted of fraud and barred from running for public office for the next five years. (Read)

  • Mayanmar: A 7.7 magnitude tremor shook Myanmar, with its epicenter near the capital Mandalay. The quake toppled several buildings and left at least 1,000 dead. Thailand also felt the tremor, with a skyscraper collapsing in Bangkok. (Read)

 

Economy & Business

unfortunately, not surprised

Oil company’s lawsuit could bankrupt Greenpeace

Who doesn’t know Greenpeace? One of the biggest environmental advocacy networks in the world says it might have to shut down if it loses a lawsuit brought by Energy Transfer Partners, the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline, that went to trial recently.

  • The suit accuses Greenpeace, its grant-making arm, and Greenpeace International of trespassing, defamation, and financial harm over their support for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s 2016/2017 nonviolent protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline’s construction.

Energy Transfer is seeking $300 million from Greenpeace USA, more than 10x the nonprofit’s annual budget, according to the New York Times. Energy Transfer is worth almost $70 billion.

Constitutional rights experts are watching closely:

  • More than 430+ organizations including Amnesty International and the American Federation of Teachers have signed an open letter condemning the lawsuit as an attempt to suppress free speech and peaceful protest.

  • Energy Transfer has denied the anti-free speech allegations, saying the suit is about “them not following the law.

SLAPP in the face: Legal experts told The Guardian and NPR that they agree with Greenpeace that the case amounts to a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, aka litigation that aims to silence a corporation’s critic with expensive court proceedings. North Dakota, where the trial is taking place over the next weeks, is one of 15 states without anti-SLAPP laws, which can help defendants get cases dismissed and recover legal costs. 

But what has Greenpeace actually done to help the planet? Well, from securing a global ban on nuclear weapons testing to establishing a 50-year moratorium on mineral exploitation in Antarctica, their impact is substantial. Notably, they played a pivotal role in achieving a moratorium on commercial whaling, leading to the creation of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. Additionally, Greenpeace's efforts contributed to the adoption of a ban on toxic waste exports to less developed countries and an end to large-scale driftnet fishing on the high seas. Just to cite a few examples.

What else in on:
  • Matcha fever. Japan’s matcha producers can’t keep up with demand despite making a record 4K tons in 2023 (almost triple 2008 levels). The vibrant green tea powder is selling out instantly as 37M tourists flock to Japan, and TikTokers showcase matcha lattes, desserts, and aesthetic “matcha stations.” (Read)

  • My husband has two jobs. A rising share of Americans, or about 5.4% of all employed workers, are learning to balance several jobs. That’s the largest share since the Great Recession in 2009, which can be seen as an indictment of the failure of employers to help nourish their employees. (Read)

  • Literally bigger than San Francisco. BYD is building its newest factory in Zhengzhou, China, which includes an entire self-sufficient city with buildings, stores, soccer fields and so on. The city's footprint is literally larger than the city of San Francisco (129.5 square kilometers vs. 121.5 square kilometers). (Read)

  • Again Elon? Tesla is issuing its 8th recall of cybertrucks since launch. This time +46,000 cars are coming back to fix defective body strips that are in danger of falling off. (Read)

 

Technology & Science

AInequality

Sam Altman Admits AI’s Benefits Won’t Be Shared Equally

 

In a new blog post, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged a tough reality: AI’s benefits might not be evenly distributed. While he believes AI can improve global prosperity, he warns that economic inequality won’t automatically be fixed—especially as AI reshapes the balance of power between capital and labor.

  • Altman proposes ideas like a “compute budget” to make AI widely accessible, but admits that scaling AI—especially toward artificial general intelligence (AGI)—will require massive investment. OpenAI is reportedly looking to raise up to $40 billion and spend $500 billion on infrastructure. At the same time, he points out that AI’s costs for users are dropping, making advanced models more accessible over time.

On AGI, Altman envisions a future where millions of hyper-capable AI systems work across industries, yet warns that AGI will still need human oversight and won’t be perfect. He also acknowledges that OpenAI may have to make “unpopular” safety decisions regarding its release. - (by unpopular, doesn’t he mean unsafe?)

Finally, he hints at OpenAI’s evolving philosophy on transparency. While the company has favored closed-source AI development, he suggests that more open-sourcing could be necessary to empower individuals rather than authoritarian regimes.

One thing is clear: AI’s future will be powerful—but who benefits most remains an open question.

What else in on:
  • Google Maps: Introduced the “Screenshot List”, which uses AI to scan images, identify locations and save them for trip planning. (Read)

  • Elon bought Elon: xAI bought X for $33 billion, allowing the network to help train the Grok chatbot (Read)

  • AIs writing newspapers. An Italian newspaper announced the world's first 100% AI-generated edition. (Read)

  • Fast Charged. BYD Accelerates in the EV Market with New 5-Minute Charging Breakthrough. The stock soared to an all-time high after the promises to charge EVs in roughly the same time it takes to fill a gas tank. (Read)

  • Talking about OpenAI… The company just closed record $40 billion funding round. Led by Japan’s SoftBank, the round—the largest ever private tech deal, per CNBC—increases OpenAI’s valuation to $300 billion. (Read)

     

EDITOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS

Music

I hope one day you heal

 I Said I Love You First by Selena Gomez & benny blanco: While the album isn’t without its missteps, I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it.

Let’s rip off the band aid: The biggest flaw, in my opinion, is the sequencing—opening with a spoken-word intro followed by the slow-paced Younger and Hotter Than Me disrupts the momentum. A punchier, more dynamic start would have served the project better. But once the album finds its footing, the middle section is simply great.

One of the biggest talking points around this album is Gomez’s relationship with Benny Blanco, which is woven throughout the project. While I’m personally not a huge fan of couples sharing every detail of their romance on social media, it’s impossible to deny that Selena seems to be in a genuinely great place. And that’s refreshing to see. Resilient in the face of relentless scrutiny—whether about her health, relationships, or career choices—Gomez continues to be an artist who reflects and resonates with her audience.

  • Blanco’s presence, both as a producer and as her fiancé, adds an interesting layer to the album. Their professional relationship stretches back over a decade—he co-wrote and produced several tracks on Revival. While he may not have Selena’s level of celebrity, Blanco’s influence on modern pop is undeniable. And honestly, I love seeing people finally recognize his talent in this phase of his career.

One of the most surprising elements of the album is its heavy Lana Del Rey influence. The songs are drenched in Lana-esque imagery—wistful California landscapes, sultry vintage aesthetics, and melancholic romance. Even Cowboy, with its hazy trap beat, carries that unmistakable Lana aura.

At this point, Revival remains Selena’s definitive album in my eyes, but I Said I Love You First and Rare are neck and neck, battling for second place—only time will tell which one prevails. What’s undeniable is how much Gomez has poured into this record. The themes, melodies, and production choices showcase her artistic growth, and you can feel the love behind every track. Whether this album will stand the test of time like Revival remains to be seen, but for now, it captures Selena Gomez in a confident, happy, and creatively rich moment. And that’s something worth celebrating. (Rating 7.5/10)

 

WHAT ABOUT ME?

Micael

give it time.

Hi there,

It’s been a while since my last time here—last time, I stepped aside to let Enzo share a bit about his book and the writing process. Did you guys like it? If so, we can definitely do more things like that.

Today, I want to talk about patience and process —something I don’t usually have much of, and, honestly, something I feel like fewer and fewer people do as time goes on.

Right now, I’m in a phase of my life where I’m planting a lot of seeds but harvesting very few. And that requires patience. The thing is, these days, we’ve shortened the time we take to process things—any and all things.

Let me explain this idea of “processing.” One of the most important figures in psychoanalysis—a branch of psychology—is Jacques Lacan. Just like you’ve probably heard of Freud, you might have heard of Lacan as well. My longtime therapist follows the Lacanian school of thought, which naturally sparked my curiosity about his work. His theories are complex, and I’m far from mastering them, but this particular concept is something I think we can all understand.

Lacan described a logical time for processing experiences, breaking it down into three stages:

  • The time to see – the immediate observation of an event; it happens in the moment, without much reflection.

  • The time to understand – the process of elaboration, where we not only reflect on our own perspective but also consider others’ viewpoints and the broader context of the world around us. This is where true understanding begins.

  • The time to conclude – the final stage, where we reach a conclusion (right or wrong) based on our observations and reflections.

In other words, before we can truly understand something, we need time to process it. Only then can we reach a meaningful conclusion. Grief, for example, is nothing more than a process of elaboration.

But in today’s hyper-connected, fast-paced world, we’re bombarded with constant stimuli. We observe too many things at once, never giving ourselves the space to properly process them. We have tools to speed up every possible process, making us less patient when it comes to thinking things through—from the smallest daily annoyances to the biggest life decisions. We’ve become so accustomed to instant gratification that we struggle with anything that takes longer than a click.

  • I recently caught myself getting impatient over a YouTube ad. And then I remembered that not long ago, streaming platforms didn’t even exist—we all just accepted commercials on TV. Sure, they were annoying, but we waited.

A few years ago, we allowed ourselves to feel boredom. We knew how to wait. And here’s the thing: It’s in the waiting—in those moments of stillness, of patience—that real processing happens.

How often do you find yourself jumping straight from observation to conclusion?

That can be dangerous in a lot of ways:

  • Anxiety levels are skyrocketing. We can’t even wait for a video to load—how can we possibly wait for the natural course of life to unfold? And this impatience takes a real toll on our bodies, too. (me included)

  • In difficult moments, people (especially young people) are making impulsive, sometimes irreversible decisions—because sitting with pain long enough to process it feels unbearable.

  • We don’t have the patience to sit through an entire movie or a boring (but necessary) class.

  • We skim the surface of a million topics but rarely take the time to truly understand or deeply engage with any of them.

We’ve shortened our time for processing, understanding, learning, and mastering things.

And why am I bringing this up? Because awareness is the first step to change. And I’ve recently became aware of how impatient I am with the processes of life.

Think about the last situation that really troubled you. Did you give it time? Did you let yourself process it fully?

  • The timeline of things doesn’t run on our schedule. It’s not just about our preferred pace—it’s also about the pace of others and, sometimes, just the natural timing of life itself.

We can’t skip steps, and often, trying to do so only creates more problems in the long run. I truly believe that patience is one of the most underrated virtues right now. There’s a time to observe, a time to process, and only then a time to conclude.

This applies to everything—from the simplest annoyances to the most overwhelming challenges. And maybe, just maybe, learning to take a deep breathe and let things flow in their natural time could start making all the difference.

With love,

M.

Subscribe to Tanamesa for your regular fix of content, entertainment, and my life. Our mission is bring everything you need to know about the most important things happening worldwide, with exclusive recommendations curated by the editor-in-chief.

Take it easy: It lands in your inbox only every second Thursday. And just like me, it is not only free but also kind of addictive.