• Tanamesa
  • Posts
  • Eating and sleeping don't count as a hobby

Eating and sleeping don't count as a hobby

There is no man, good as he may be, who, if all his thoughts and actions were submitted to the scrutiny of the laws, would not deserve hanging ten times in his life. - Michel de Montaigne

THE MUSTS

World

123 countries. One verdict. Three said no.

The debt the world keeps refusing to pay

 Last month, the United Nations General Assembly did something that took centuries to happen: it officially declared the transatlantic slave trade the gravest crime against humanity — ever committed.

The resolution, spearheaded by Ghana, passed with 123 votes in favor. Only three countries voted against it: Argentina, Israel, and the United States (what a surprise!). 52 countries abstained.

What does the resolution actually say?

  • It unequivocally condemns the trafficking of enslaved Africans and the transatlantic slave trade as "the most inhumane and enduring injustice against humanity."

  • It calls on member states to engage in dialogue on reparatory justice — including formal apologies, financial compensation, and systemic changes to address racism and discrimination.

  • It also urges the prompt restitution of cultural items — artworks, monuments, museum pieces and national archives — to their countries of origin, free of charge.

To understand the scale of what's being recognized: at least 12.5 million Africans were abducted and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries. The consequences — racial inequality, generational poverty, systemic discrimination — never went away. They just changed shape.

Why the abstentions matter as much as the votes against. The United Kingdom and all 27 members of the European Union — several of which directly profited from slavery for centuries — chose to abstain. Their official reason? The EU argued that calling slavery the "gravest" crime against humanity implies a legal hierarchy among atrocities — a hierarchy that, according to international law, does not exist. Technically, they have a point. Morally, it lands differently.

The US, for its part, stated it does not recognize a legal right to reparations for historical wrongs that were not illegal under international law at the time they were committed.

  • Does this resolution actually change anything? Unlike Security Council resolutions, General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding. No country is now forced to pay reparations or issue an apology. But that doesn't mean it's just symbolic. Analysts say it sends a powerful message and could increase the chances of progress on reparations discussions. History tends to move slowly — and this is how it starts.

As one researcher put it: "Nobody is trying to change the past, but to address its consequences in the present. Slavery legacies still endure today in the shape of racism and inequality. Recognising the past is crucial if we want fairer and more democratic societies."

Personal Opinion: With immigration debates dominating wealthy nations, inequality widening globally, and racism on the rise — this resolution matters beyond symbolism. It draws a direct line between past and present: the same system that enslaved millions is the one that built the wealth gaps, the racial hierarchies, and the borders that people are now desperately trying to cross. If the countries and individuals who benefited from that system — and continue to benefit — are unwilling to acknowledge it or work toward any form of repair, then they have very little ground to stand on when judging the people who do whatever it takes to build a better life. You can't inherit the gains and disown the debt.

What else in on
  • Mexico is launching its own universal healthcare system — inspired by Brazil's SUS: Mexico has formalized an agreement with Brazil to restructure its public health system, decoupling medical access from social security contributions so that all 129 million Mexicans can receive free care regardless of employment status. The country also wants to replicate Brazil's success in free medication distribution and neighborhood-level preventive care. (Read)

  • The US is moving to automatic military registration for men 18–25: In its biggest military law reform in decades, the US government will now automatically enroll all men between 18 and 25 in the Selective Service system. The law takes effect in December. (Read)

  • Luxembourg will become the second European country after France to protect abortion in its constitution. On March, the Chamber of Deputies backed a constitutional amendment stating that “the freedom to resort to voluntary termination of pregnancy is guaranteed”, with 48 votes in favour, six against and two abstentions. (Read)

 

Economy & Business

should we buy the dip?

LVMH has had its worst start to the year ever

It seems that not even Bernard Arnault is immune to the global crisis. The empire behind brands like Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany & Co. has just recorded the worst start to a year in its history.

LVMH shares plummeted 28% in the first quarter of 2026. To get an idea of the magnitude of the drop, the performance was worse than during the 2008 crisis and even at the start of the pandemic in 2020.

Why this matters: The luxury sector is considered the global “barometer of confidence.” When the wealthiest stop spending, it’s a sign that the global economy is on high alert.

Unlike other luxury brands, such as Hermès, which fell by “only” 25%, LVMH relies heavily on customers who buy accessories to “boost their status.” In times of crisis, these are the first consumers to disappear.

To give you an idea, Bernard Arnault’s fortune shrank by $56 billion in just three months. He now ranks second in terms of the largest net worth loss of the year, behind only Larry Ellison (nearly $200 billion).

What else is on (Hollywood edition):
  • Once upon a time, Hollywood was the only option: Since late 2022, entertainment industry employment in the US has dropped 30%, with major scripted productions falling from 251 in 2021 to 159 in 2025. Countries like the UK, Canada, and Hungary are absorbing the demand with tax incentives that can cover up to half of production costs. With streaming giants now prioritizing sports rights over new series, and Wall Street pressuring studios for immediate returns, Hollywood risks becoming a bureaucratic hub while the movie magic happens wherever taxes are lowest. (Read)

  • That being said… — Gen Z's night out is at the movies: Zoomers now represent 39% of North American cinema audiences, driving record-breaking box offices like Zootopia 2's $1.86B gross — surpassing the entire Avatar franchise. Unlike Millennials, Gen Z treats cinema as a social event, not a streaming alternative, and with alcohol consumption among under-35s dropping to just 62%, movie theaters have become the go-to hangout. The new formula? Franchises built around video games, anime, and YouTubers — not your dad's action heroes. (Read)

 

Extra

here we love dogs… and dads

The real pet parent

An Australian IT technician spent $3,000 and achieved in two months what the pharmaceutical industry had failed to do in years, despite spending billions.

When Paul Conyngham adopted Rosie, he had no idea his little dog had aggressive cancer. He tried everything (surgery, chemo, immunotherapy), but the prognosis gave her no more than six months to live. So Paul did what anyone who’s constantly online would do: he opened ChatGPT and asked for help.

  1. The chatbot suggested using genetic sequencing

  2. Paul paid $3,000 to sequence Rosie’s DNA

  3. He asked for help from UNSW (University of New South Wales in Australia)

  4. He used AlphaFold to model the protein structures based on the mutations

  5. He created a personalized mRNA vaccine and administered the first dose

One month after the injection, Rosie’s tennis-ball-sized tumor had already shrunk by 75%. A guy with no degree or experience in biology, using a chatbot, in two months… Paul even said that the science behind it wasn’t even the hardest part. The real challenge was obtaining the necessary legal authorizations.

Zoom out: The pharmaceutical industry spends, on average, $2.3 billion to bring a new drug or vaccine to market—760,000 times more than the engineer’s project.

EDITOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS

Movies

true love is complicated. It’s about acceptance. Radical acceptance.

 The Drama by Kristoffer Borgli: Before we even get to the film — this marketing campaign deserves a moment. A24 is always articulate with its guerrilla strategies, but this one was something else entirely. It started in December 2025 with a fake engagement announcement printed in the Boston Globe — not a digital ad, not a sponsored post, but an actual physical notice in the style of a traditional society page, complete with family backgrounds, academic credentials, and a wedding date: April 3rd, which also happens to be the film's release date. Then came a seemingly real wedding photography account, posting golden-hour engagement shots of Zendaya and Pattinson in character. No winks at the camera. No studio watermarks. Just two people apparently in love. Valentine's Day brought a fully operational wedding website, charlieandemmaforever.com, with an RSVP portal, dress code guidance, and an "Our Story" section with just enough instability simmering beneath the surface for those paying close attention. Being a fan of immersive storytelling — the way SKAM did it for years — I genuinely enjoyed watching it unfold. But the marketing isn't the review. So. The film.

The Drama follows Emma (Zendaya) and Charlie (Pattinson), a happily engaged couple whose wedding week completely derails after a shocking confession surfaces out of nowhere. From there, what looked like a romantic comedy slowly becomes something far less comfortable — a dissection of trust, judgment, and the unsettling question of how well you can ever truly know the person you're about to spend your life with.

The confession itself — which I won't spoil — touches on something genuinely serious, particularly in the American context. And that's where the film becomes interesting and divisive at the same time. Borgli has a rare gift for balancing dark humor with real discomfort. He's not here to reassure you. The film asks whether people are defined by their worst moments, whether one buried truth can shatter everything you thought was solid — and it refuses to soften the answer into something digestible.

  • What holds everything together is Zendaya and Pattinson, both operating at a genuinely impressive level, with characters that seemed almost made for them. Zendaya balances restraint and emotional opacity with moments of striking vulnerability. Pattinson, meanwhile, does something he rarely gets to do: play an ordinary, likable man — and then watches that man slowly lose the ability to trust his own judgment. It's witty, precise, and occasionally very funny in the most uncomfortable way possible.

For me, film does unearth a genuinely romantic idea at its core: that what happens between two people is ultimately only about those two people, and nobody else's verdict really matters. There are moments where you laugh and immediately wonder if you should be laughing. There are scenes that will spark arguments on the walk out of the cinema.

I know I wanted to talk about it after. And that, for me, is usually enough. (Rating: 8/10)

WHAT ABOUT ME?

Micael

self confidence is about having a hobby

I have always tried to surround myself with people smarter than me.

It's something I genuinely believe in: if you're the most talented person in the room, you're probably in the wrong room. And looking around at my friends, I am constantly in awe. I have friends who are exceptional musicians, brilliant doctors, gifted writers, developers who built things from nothing. And I love that. I chose that.

  • But if I'm honest — and this newsletter has taught me to be — there was always a quiet side effect to it. And a lot of times that side effect was feeling less. "You are the fun one, Micael." "You're just the pretty, utterly handsome one, Micael." But not the talented one. Everyone has their thing, and for a long time, I wasn't sure what mine was.

Then I started this newsletter.

I didn't launch it thinking it would change how I see myself. I launched it because I had things to say and a vague, stubborn feeling that someone out there might want to read them. But somewhere along the way, things began to shift.

Because here's what I've come to believe: it's not enough to be passionate about something. Passion is the easy part. What actually builds self-confidence — real, durable confidence — is getting good at something. Practicing it. Showing up for it even when it feels pointless or like no one is paying attention.

  • There's a version of loving films that most people have — you watch them, you feel something, you move on. And then there's the version where you start to understand why a scene works, what the director was thinking, how the light was used, what that film was responding to in its cultural moment. The feeling is similar. The depth is completely different.

Hobbies, real ones, do that. They take something you enjoy and, through repetition and curiosity, turn it into something you know. And knowing something — truly knowing it — builds a kind of confidence that no one can take from you, because it isn't based on comparison. It's based on craft.

Can you think of something you do because you love doing it? Something that interests you, captures your attention, and makes you lose track of time? If nothing comes to mind, you've got some homework to do: go on a hobby hunt.

  • Do you like fashion? Try to understand the basics of patternmaking, cutting, sewing, patterns, aesthetics, and styles. Copying store windows or an influencer's look is something anyone can do — but having an authentic style full of personality is another story.

  • Do you like wine? Learn to decipher aromas and flavours, understand the role of terroir. It's not hard to like wine, but it takes time for a sommelier to refine their palate.

  • Do you like sports? Understand the rules of different games, get to know the all-time greats across various disciplines, research what makes up an athlete's routine and why only one in a million manages to stand out.

  • Do you like visiting art galleries? Study art history. Learn how to join a conversation about it and critique a work based on the zeitgeist, the artist's background, and the techniques used. Beauty is beautiful to most — but understanding why it's beautiful is not.

Writing this newsletter has done that for me. It has made me a sharper writer, a more curious reader. It has given me a relationship with language and tone of voice that feels like mine. It has also, ploddingly and without fanfare, given me something to point to when that little voice shows up in my head saying I am not good enough.

I still think my friends are more talented than me in most things. That hasn't changed. But I've stopped needing that not to be true. Because I have my thing now. And that changed everything.

If you've been waiting to start something — a newsletter, a course, an instrument, a language, a craft — I want to gently tell you: the confidence doesn't come before the practice. It comes from it. You don't wait until you feel ready. You become ready by going.

Then one day, without quite noticing, you'll realise you've become someone who knows how to do something — and that person is a little harder to shake.

With love,

Micael.

Subscribe to Tanamesa for your regular fix of content, entertainment, and my life. Our mission is bring everything you need to know about the most important things happening worldwide, with exclusive recommendations curated by the editor-in-chief.

Take it easy: It lands in your inbox only every second Thursday. And just like me, it is not only free but also kind of addictive.